skip to navigationskip to main content

Phone: 0191 5678129 

Email:

Inheritance tax - why giving away money can mean more for the beneficiaries

Newsletter issue - September 2021

In most cases, it doesn't make sense to simply give away money to save tax during a person's lifetime. For example, a higher rate taxpayer can claim tax relief to offset their income tax bill on qualifying donations made via the gift aid scheme. However, the cost of the donation will always exceed the relief, so it doesn't make sense to make additional donations purely from a tax perspective, though they can be useful for helping to avoid things like the high-income child benefit charge.

However, when it comes to the interaction with wills and charitable bequests, there can be circumstances where increasing the amount given away can actually mean there is more money left over for the beneficiaries.

Since 2012, a reduced rate of inheritance tax (IHT) of 36% applies where at least 10% of an estate is left to a qualifying charity. On the face of it this is simplistic, but as is often the case there are complications once the details are examined.

For one thing, it is not always necessary to bequeath 10% of everything owned. The estate is split into three components:

  • Survivorship assets. Property owned jointly with others and which automatically passes to them upon death.
  • Settled property. This refers to the part of the estate, if any, that is held in trust.
  • Everything else. Charitable bequests are treated as coming from this first.

The 36% tax applies to any of these where 10% or more of it (after taking into account a proportion of the nil-rate band and other reliefs) is donated, i.e. so that the reduced rate may apply to some assets, but the full rate applies to others.

However, it is also possible to make an election to merge components and compare the charitable gifts to their aggregate value. If the gifts exceed 10% of the aggregated value, the reduced rate can apply to more than one component. Let's illustrate this with a straightforward case study.

Mark

Mark's estate is worth £1.2 million. This consists of family company shares worth £500,000, a joint share in the home worth £450,000 and chattels worth £250,000. Mark dies in 2021, leaving the company shares to his two children, £35,000 to a charity, and the remainder to his unmarried partner Karen.

There is no settled property, so we only need to look at the survivorship and general components.

Survivorship component

This consists of the interest in the property of £450,000, less the proportion of the nil rate band, i.e. £325,000 x (450,000/(450,000 + 250,000 - 35,000) = £219,925. So, the baseline the survivorship component is £230,075. Note that the residence NRB is not deducted.

General component

This consists of the family shares, less 100% BPR, i.e. £nil, as well as the chattels worth £250,000. The donation is treated as coming from this component for the purposes of calculating the baseline so the chargeable value is £215,000, less the remaining nil rate band of £105,075, i.e. £144,925.

The donation is therefore more than the 10% baseline for either component in isolation, for example the assets in the general component could be taxed at 36%, but the merging election wouldn't work here because the aggregated baseline is £375,000, so £35,000 is less than 10%.

However, the beneficiaries could make a deed of variation to increase the contributions. This could actually mean that they end up with more money.

Example

Charlie dies in 2021. There are no survivorship assets or settled property in the estate, which is worth a total of £1,325,000. Charlie left £80,000 to a cancer charity. The baseline here is £1,325,000 less the nil rate band, i.e. £1 million. As the donation is not at least 10% of this, the £920,000 net estate is charged at 40%, i.e. a bill of £368,000. The beneficiaries will receive £877,000. However, if the donation was increased to £100,000, the 10% test would be met. The IHT bill would be £324,000. The beneficiaries would receive £901,000, i.e. the additional £20,000 donation has actually saved them money due to the reduction in IHT of £44,000.

While it won't always pay to make additional donations, this should be kept in mind when drafting wills, or when looking at death estates where some charitable donations have already been made.

Choosing a Service

Choosing an accountant that matches your needs

Meet our team

Go through our accountancy team, and see what they are

Free Initial Consultation

Understanding your accountancy requirements

Request a Callback

Lets talk at a more convenient time for you

Great reasons and promises we make to you which is why you should call us before deciding on your accountant.

Our Promises

We’re a dedicated team which strives to provide success to our clients in regards to all their accountancy needs.

Meet our team
footer_icons_artwork

Compliance and Advice

We believe you should always be control of your fees with no surprises. You are entitled to a competitive fixed quote for agreed services, which is exactly what we charge, no a penny more.

Fixed Price Accounting

We'll help you obtain clear goals in the long, medium and short term for what you want to achieve and identify the challenges in the plan and put strategies in place to overcome them.

Tailored Advice

Each business is unique and the challenges they face will be particular to your business and sector and as such our business advice is tailored to be a precise fit for you and your organisation.

Newsletter Subscription

Our monthly newsletter is full of news, views and interesting information from Michael Adamson & Co. Find out more by visiting our newsletter signup form.